Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568535›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

Reframing physical literacy for lifelong movement and societal wellbeing: a habit-informed perspective.

Nigel Green, Kyle Pushkarenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nigel GreenIPLA, Wigan, United Kingdom.
Kyle PushkarenkoMemorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical inactivity remains a persistent global challenge with implications for physical, cognitive, emotional, and social wellbeing across the lifecourse. Physical literacy has become an influential framework for understanding lifelong engagement in movement, yet less attention has been given to how such engagement becomes sustained, interrupted, and renewed in everyday life. This conceptual paper develops a habit-informed perspective on physical literacy by examining the recurring patterns through which people come to notice, value, prioritise, and return to movement across contexts and life stages. Drawing on habit theory, identity-based motivation, and physical literacy scholarship, the paper argues that sustained engagement in movement depends not only on capability, knowledge, or motivation, but also on repeated ways of thinking, feeling, relating, and acting. Stephen Covey's Seven Habits are used as a heuristic scaffold for naming pedagogically relevant patterns, including agency, purpose, prioritisation, inclusive participation, empathy, collaboration, and renewal. The paper further situates physical literacy as relevant to the Inner Development Goals and selected United Nations Sustainable Development Goals by showing how physical education may support inner capacities and broader societal aims related to health, education, equity, and sustainable communities. Physical literacy is therefore reframed as a context-sensitive relationship with movement that is shaped by biography, social relationships, access, opportunity, and repeated educational experiences. Implications are outlined for physical education pedagogy, curriculum, and research, with emphasis on supporting lifelong movement in ways that are meaningful, inclusive, and socially responsive.

Indexed as

habitslifelong movementphysical activityphysical literacywellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42568535
PMCPMC13447296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.