ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Mapping seasonal dynamics of forage and cereal crops in a hyper-arid environment using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In arid and hyper-arid regions, agriculture depends heavily on irrigation, making crop type monitoring important for water allocation, monitoring crop management policies, and providing the information required to forecast food supply. However, field labels are often scarce, and crop calendars can shift due to locally managed planting, harvest, and irrigation decisions, complicating mapping at field-scale. Methods: We present a seasonal crop type mapping approach applied to Wadi Al-Dawasir, Saudi Arabia, generating maps for 2020-2024 from biweekly optical and radar satellite time series. The method learns representations from unlabeled imagery through self-supervised pretraining and fine-tunes a segmentation model using a small set of field observations with pseudo-label augmentation from unsupervised clustering. We mapped four classes: fallow, cereal, vegetables, and forage, and evaluated performance using overall accuracy, F1-score, and mean intersection-over-union (mIoU). Results: The configuration combining self-supervised pretraining, pseudo-label augmentation, and optical-radar inputs achieved an mIoU of 0.80, an F1-score of 0.88, and an overall accuracy of 0.97. In contrast, using optical information alone substantially reduced accuracy, with an mIoU of 0.35, an F1-score of 0.32, and an overall accuracy of 0.64. Fallow and forage produced the highest mapping accuracies, with mIoU values of 0.97 and 0.85, respectively, while vegetables had the lowest accuracy among the four crop groups, with an mIoU of 0.52. Discussion: These results show that self-supervised temporal pretraining combined with pseudo-label augmentation can support efficient multi-season, field-scale crop mapping using limited labels in irrigation-driven arid regions. The lower accuracy for vegetables highlights the continued challenge of mapping heterogeneous crop groups with overlapping phenological patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.