ArticleForestry research2026
Tree size and relative height interactions enhance generalized additive models for Chinese fir stem taper prediction.
Article in Forestry research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tree stem taper varies dynamically with tree size due to biomechanical constraints governing stability, yet capturing this size-dependent shape plasticity remains a challenge in forest biometrics. Traditional variable-exponent models impose rigid functional forms, while emerging machine learning approaches often obscure these biological relationships within black-box structures. Furthermore, previous applications of generalized additive models (GAMs) have predominantly focused on additive effects, overlooking the critical interactions between tree size and relative position along the stem. To address this gap, we investigated whether explicitly modeling the nonlinear interactions between tree size and relative height could resolve systematic biases in taper prediction. Using a dataset of 516 felled Chinese fir (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.