ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in large B-cell lymphoma: clinical evidence, resistance, toxicity, and precision strategies.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the management of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), producing durable remissions in a subset of patients whose disease previously had few curative options. Axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel established CAR T-cell therapy in the third-line setting, and randomized studies subsequently moved axicabtagene ciloleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel into second-line treatment for primary refractory or early relapsed disease. This review provides a clinically anchored, mechanism-focused synthesis of CAR T-cell therapy in LBCL. We critically compare pivotal trials, long-term follow-up, patient-selection principles, and real-world evidence, emphasizing that apparent differences across products must be interpreted in light of eligibility criteria, analytic denominators, bridging therapy, manufacturing intervals, toxicity grading, and treatment crossover. We then examine resistance and relapse as systems-level phenomena arising from antigen modulation, tumor-intrinsic evolution, impaired CAR T-cell fitness, suppressive myeloid and stromal networks, systemic inflammation, metabolic stress, and incomplete immune recovery. The biological basis and clinical implications of cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, prolonged cytopenias, infections, and late nonrelapse mortality are also reviewed. Finally, we discuss circulating tumor DNA, metabolic imaging, single-cell and multi-omic profiling, artificial intelligence, dual-target and armored constructs, allogeneic platforms, and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.