Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568476›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Laparoscopic liver resection for pediatric liver tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hanlei Yan, Baijun Zheng, Donghao Tian, Ya Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanlei YanDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Baijun ZhengDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Donghao TianDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Ya GaoDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for pediatric liver tumors. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Chinese databases (CNKI, WanFang, VIP) for studies on LLR for pediatric liver tumors. Following PRISMA guidelines, nine studies (144 LLR patients) were selected and evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Meta-analysis of single-arm proportions and continuous variables was conducted using R 4.4.1, with comparative analysis against open liver resection (OLR). Results: The pooled mean maximum tumor diameter was 5.69 cm (95% CI: 4.85-6.53). Mean operative time was 208.77 min (95% CI: 153.74-263.80), and intraoperative blood loss 88.80 mL (95% CI: 31.33-146.27). Transfusion proportion was 32% (95% CI: 16%-54%), hospital stay was 6.8 days (95% CI: 4-9.6), and the overall postoperative complications 16% (95% CI: 10%-24%) including 11% bile leakage (95% CI: 6%-19%). Notably, no gas embolism or port site metastasis occurred. The hepatoblastoma recurrence proportion was 9% (95% CI: 5%-19%). LLR required significantly longer operative time (+60.02 min; Conclusion: LLR appears safe and feasible for pediatric liver tumors in selected patients. Limited evidence and heterogeneous patient selection warrant propensity score matching and multicenter prospective studies to establish surgical indications and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Indexed as

hepatectomylaparoscopicliver tumorpediatricsystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID42568476
PMCPMC13447245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.