ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
The value of perioperative nutritional risk stratification in the prevention of surgical site infection: precision application from GLIM/PG-SGA to PNI, CONUT, and GNRI.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a major postoperative complication despite advances in perioperative prophylaxis and standardized care. Increasing evidence suggests that perioperative malnutrition is a host-related condition linking systemic inflammation, impaired immune recovery, low muscle mass, delayed wound healing, and increased susceptibility to infection. This narrative review summarizes the biological relationship between perioperative malnutrition and SSI, critically compares the roles of GLIM, PG-SGA, PNI, CONUT, and GNRI, and distinguishes SSI-specific findings from evidence based on broader postoperative outcomes. GLIM and PG-SGA are most useful for defining clinically meaningful malnutrition phenotypes, whereas PNI, CONUT, and GNRI support rapid and objective risk quantification. Because these tools capture different dimensions of nutritional vulnerability, we propose a complementary, stepwise pathway integrating early screening, phenotype-based diagnosis, secondary risk stratification, targeted intervention, and postoperative reassessment. This framework should be regarded as a hypothesis-generating clinical model that requires prospective validation before it can be adopted as a standardized SSI-prevention algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.