ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Persistence, switching, and discontinuation patterns of b/tsDMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study from Saudi Arabia.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To characterize real-world treatment patterns, including persistence, switching, and discontinuation, of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Dammam Medical Complex in Saudi Arabia. Adult RA patients naïve to b/tsDMARDs who initiated therapy between January 1, 2013, and January 31, 2023, were included. Treatment patterns were summarized using descriptive statistics. Drug survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 175 eligible patients, first-line therapy was a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFI) in 109 (62.3%), a non-TNFI in 47 (26.9%), and tofacitinib in 19 (10.9%). Estimated drug survival probabilities at 5 years were 0.47 (95% CI: 0.37-0.59) for TNFIs, 0.51 (95% CI: 0.38-0.68) for non-TNFIs, and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.48-0.97) for tofacitinib. At 10 years, survival was 0.33 (95% CI: 0.23-0.48) for TNFIs and 0.27 (95% CI: 0.16-0.45) for non-TNFIs. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference across classes (log-rank Conclusion: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were the most commonly initiated first-line b/tsDMARD in this Saudi cohort. Persistence appeared comparable across classes, although the small sample size limits definitive conclusions. These findings provide initial real-world insights into the utilization of advanced RA therapies at a single tertiary center in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.