ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Unveiling the biochemical signature of tumor-induced osteomalacia: implications for distinguishing it from primary osteoporosis.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome caused by FGF23-secreting tumors, resulting in renal phosphate wasting and hypophosphatemic osteomalacia. Low bone mineral density (BMD) in TIO frequently leads to misdiagnosis as the more prevalent primary osteoporosis (POP) and subsequent diagnostic delay. This study characterizes the distinct biochemical profile of TIO and proposes a stepwise diagnostic approach to differentiate it from POP for timely clinical identification and appropriate management. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis of 11 TIO patients and 12 POP patients managed at our institution over a 14-year period. Detailed clinical data were collected and compared between groups, including history, physical examination findings, laboratory results, imaging studies, and pathological outcomes. Results: Comparative analysis revealed that, compared with POP patients, TIO patients had significantly lower serum calcium (2.19 ± 0.1 vs.2.3 ± 0.1 mmol/L, Conclusions: We recommend serum phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and TmP/GFR tests for symptomatic patients (e.g., bone pain, muscle weakness). Confirmed hypophosphatemia warrants FGF23 testing after excluding other causes of elevation. Subsequent bone X-ray and BMD guides the need for molecular imaging. The diagnostic gold standard comprises: (1) histopathological confirmation of the causative tumor, (2) rapid postoperative serum phosphate normalization, and (3) significant clinical improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.