ArticleGlobal change biology2026
Continental-Scale Biodiversity Predictions Are Influenced by Climatic Variability and Extreme Weather.
Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasingly variable and extreme weather can push organisms beyond their physiological thermal or hydric tolerances and limit where they can persist, affecting their geographic distributions and biodiversity patterns. For example, organisms often live near their physiological limits at range edges and may be unable to persist in these regions under variable and extreme conditions. However, it remains unclear how climatic variability and extreme weather define continental-scale species distributions and biodiversity patterns. Here we link hundreds of millions of citizen science bird observations from 2004 to 2024 to high-resolution maps of within-year climatic variability and extreme weather risk, exploring how these factors define both summer and winter distributions and biodiversity patterns for 535 North American species across 2901 individual models. We find that species distribution models accounting for climatic variability or extreme weather risk performed better than others at predicting richness and individual species presences across 220 well-surveyed sites. Such models predicted narrower geographic distributions than models relying on only climatic means, especially at the range edges, resulting in species' ranges that were truncated on average by 6% in summer and 10% in winter when climatic variability and extreme weather variables were included. These effects were observed in both seasons but were particularly strong in winter, a time with greater short-term weather variability than summer. Richness estimates were substantially lower when climatic variability or extreme weather were accounted for, especially in the US southwest and central plains (up to 35 fewer species), regions highly prone to extreme heat, cold, and drought. Our results suggest that more mechanistically informed biodiversity predictions that account for climatic variability and extreme weather are critical for reliably predicting distributional and biodiversity patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.