ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Detecting Young Children's Deception Using Facial Expression Analysis With High Dimensional Statistical Methods.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although deception is common in early childhood, accurately detecting deception remains a significant challenge. The present study aims to investigate the feasibility of using high-dimensional statistical methods to detect children's deception through facial expressions, with a focus on incorporating two time-dependent statistics: slope and fitness. We analyzed the facial expressions of 93 three- to six-year-old children during a guessing game. A machine vision algorithm (FACET) assessed the likelihood of nine basic facial expressions. We extracted three statistics (mean, slope and fitness) for each facial expression. Then, we used high-dimensional feature selection method to filter out irrelevant features. We adopted two parametric (logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis) and two non-parametric statistical methods (random forest, adaptive boosting) and tested both the full feature set ("full model") and the selected feature set ("2-step model"). The results showed adding time-dependent statistics (slope and fitness) improved performance, with the average balanced accuracy increasing from 47.2% to 62.0%. Feature selection further enhanced the model performance (from 60.8% to 63.3%). In addition, balanced accuracy provided a more conservative and reliable measure than the original accuracy (54.6% vs. 61.5%). These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using dynamic facial emotional features to detect deception in early childhood and highlight the potential of computational methods for advancing developmental research on emotion and social cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.