ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
The Impact of Denoising Approaches on the Relationship Between Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic Status and Network Topology Measures.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graph theory provides a promising technique to investigate Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related alterations in brain network properties. However, there are discrepancies in the reported disruptions that occur to network topology across the AD continuum. In this study, we examined whether diagnostic group differences in graph metrics are attributed to differences in denoising approach used in fMRI processing. Resting state data from 60 cognitively normal (CN), 55 Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and 38 AD participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were denoised using 11 pipelines including combinations of confound regression (head motion parameters, white matter [WM], cerebrospinal fluid [CSF], global signal), volume censoring (scrubbing, spike regression), and component-based noise removal (Independent Component Analysis-based Automatic Removal of Motion Artifacts [ICA-AROMA], anatomical and temporal component correction). Graph metrics representing network segregation (clustering coefficient, modularity, local efficiency), network integration (largest connected component, path length, global efficiency), and small-worldness were calculated. The results revealed that diagnostic group differences in modularity and local efficiency were dependent on denoising approach, especially in high-parameter regression models in combination with censoring methods (36 parameters and spike regressor or volume censoring). Independent of denoising approach, CN exhibited more segregated (clustering coefficient) but less integrated (largest component, path length, global efficiency) networks than MCI and AD. Independent of diagnosis, denoising strategy significantly affected the magnitude of all metrics, particularly models including global signal regression. Collectively, these results suggest that the directionality of the diagnostic differences in network topology, particularly in global metrics of network segregation, can vary based upon the denoising approach employed, although the effect size is small. Transparent reporting of preprocessing decisions is critical for the accurate interpretation of graph theoretical findings in the context of AD and a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying pathological aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.