ReviewBiomedical chromatography : BMC2026
Chromatographic Characterization of Nasal and Inhalation Drug Products: A Review of Liquid Chromatography Strategies for Formulation Assessment, Particle Size Correlation, and In Vitro Performance Testing.
Review in Biomedical chromatography : BMC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid chromatography (LC) has become indispensable for characterizing nasal and inhalation drug products, yet a critical gap persists in integrating chromatographic data with particle size metrics and in vitro performance outcomes to predict in vivo behavior. This review highlights recent advances in LC strategies from reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography to ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; across three interconnected domains: formulation physicochemical characterization, aerodynamic particle size distribution determination, and comprehensive in vitro performance testing. We critically evaluated how LC-based quantification enables simultaneous active pharmaceutical ingredient and impurity profiling, dissolution kinetics assessment, and regional deposition mapping, with method validation data demonstrating linearity spanning three to four orders of magnitude and limits of detection as low as 5 pg/mL. Notably, we highlighted the mechanistic discrimination of erosion-vs. diffusion-controlled release enabled by simultaneous active pharmaceutical ingredient-polymer dissolution profiling and established quantitative correlations between particle size and systemic bioavailability. The review identified persistent challenges in biorelevant dissolution standardization and device-formulation interaction modeling while proposing integrated frameworks for bioequivalence prediction. This comprehensive perspective positions LC not merely as an analytical tool but as the central bridge connecting formulation properties, aerosol performance, and therapeutic outcomes, offering actionable insights for regulatory evaluation in respiratory drug delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.