ArticleMusculoskeletal care2026
The Development of Spinal Pain Beliefs: Patient Journey Mapping From Onset of Symptoms to MRI: A Qualitative Interview Study.
Article in Musculoskeletal care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBeliefs about pain influence not only how individuals experience spinal pain but also their management behaviours. Health professionals are considered to play a central role in shaping these beliefs, yet little is known about how they evolve over time and which factors contribute to their development. This study explored how spinal pain beliefs develop across the patient journey from symptom onset to the point of MRI examination, applying the method of Patient Journey Mapping.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with six individuals experiencing long-term spinal pain. Interviews were transcribed ad verbatim and analysed using Malterud's systematic text condensation. An illustrative patient journey was then mapped, linking final code groups to touchpoints that reflected the development of pain beliefs in one informant.
resultsThree code groups were constructed: (1) Influence of health professionals, (2) Societal and cultural influences, and (3) Lived experiences with pain. Informants' beliefs about spinal pain were dynamic, shaped and reshaped by influences across the three code groups, showing considerable change over time. Encounters with health professionals emerged as particularly influential, often reinforcing biomedical understandings. However, when information was conflicting or incongruent, it frequently gave rise to doubt and uncertainty.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the value of Patient Journey Mapping in uncovering how spinal pain beliefs dynamically evolve through cumulative influences of healthcare encounters, social context, and lived bodily experiences. The findings highlight the critical role of health professionals, underscoring the need for clear and consistent communication to foster helpful understandings of pain and avoid reinforcing limiting or maladaptive understandings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.