ReviewClinical and translational science2026
Drug-Drug Interaction Risk Assessment Strategies for Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Literature-Based Evidence Mini-Review.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biologic therapies are traditionally regarded as having low potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to their large molecular size and limited direct involvement with drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters (DMETs). However, accumulating evidence indicates that these drug products may indirectly modulate DMET activity through cytokine-mediated mechanisms, particularly in the context of inflammatory diseases. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 have been shown to suppress the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in vitro, most notably CYP3A4, thereby potentially altering the metabolic clearance of concomitant medications. This phenomenon may be pertinent in conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) where chronic inflammation and systemic physiological alterations may significantly influence drug disposition. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration provides a decision framework to assess large molecule DDI risk based on the mechanism of action, it does not offer a standardized, mechanistic approach for evaluating such interactions. In response, alternative methodologies such as the use of endogenous biomarkers like 4β-hydroxycholesterol, a proposed surrogate for CYP3A activity, and pharmacokinetic modeling are in exploration to support DDI risk assessment to potentially avoid dedicated clinical trials in patients. This review evaluates current knowledge on biologics-mediated DDIs with a particular focus on drug-disease interactions in IBD. There is an opportunity for a more structured, mechanistically informed evaluation that integrates cytokine profiling and biomarker-based approaches to identify DDI risk and enhance the overall understanding of the degree of interaction and its clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.