Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2026
The impact of an intensive care telemedicine program on weaning from invasive ventilation: a secondary analysis of the ERIC trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03671447 (Enhanced Recovery After Intensive Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhanced Recovery After Intensive Care (ERIC) - a Multi-Center Stepped Wedge Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundICU patients commonly require invasive mechanical ventilation. Although weaning from ventilation is crucial for patient outcomes, it is commonly not performed according to guideline recommendations. We investigated if a complex telemedicine intervention improves the weaning process and outcomes.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of the stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled Enhanced Recovery after Intensive Care (ERIC) trial, which was conducted among ten clusters of ICUs in the metropolitan area of Berlin, Germany. ERIC examined the impact of a complex telemedicine intervention, which included daily telemedicine rounding by an intensivist and ICU nurse, on the adherence to eight quality indicators of ICU care. We analyzed patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation for at least two consecutive days and at least one spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). We investigated the impact of the intervention on the weaning process and weaning outcomes using descriptive statistics and mixed-effects regressions.
resultsOf 1,463 patients enrolled in the trial, 308 patients were analyzed (control condition: 55; intervention condition: 253). Patients in the intervention group received significantly more SBTs than patients in the control group (51% vs 27% of the patient days; p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups with respect to the weaning classification (p = 0.21), weaning success rate (28% vs 36%; p = 0.32), and time from the first SBT to successful weaning (2 [IQR 1, 5] vs 4 [IQR 1, 13] days; p = 0.12). The median time of invasive mechanical ventilation of successfully weaned patients was significantly shorter in the intervention than in the control group (7 [IQR 4, 10] vs 9 [IQR 6, 20] days; p = 0.031). In our multivariable regressions, the intervention was not associated with weaning success (OR for weaning failure: 1.45 [95%-CI 0.71-2.95]; p = 0.302), but with a shorter time between the first SBT and successful weaning (β = 0.56 [0.32-0.98]; p = 0.042).
conclusionsAlthough ICU telemedicine did not improve the weaning success rate, our findings indicate that it facilitates the exploitation of existing weaning potential by ensuring more frequent SBTs and thereby shortening ventilation duration of successfully weaned patients. The study is the first to highlight the potential of telemedicine to enhance ICU weaning practices. REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (Identifier: NCT03671447; first submitted on August 22, 2018).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.