Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568092›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2026

Integrating multi-layer perceptron and random forest in an ensemble framework for improved genomic prediction accuracy and SHAP-derived interpretability of residual feed intake in cattle.

Edwin Jun Kiat Ong, Mark H Mooney, Faisal I Rezwan, Hui Wang, Masoud Shirali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edwin Jun Kiat OngInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8910-444X
Mark H MooneyInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-341X
Faisal I RezwanDepartment of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9921-222X
Hui WangSchool of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2633-6015
Masoud ShiraliInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. Masoud.Shirali@afbini.gov.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-0541

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T008776/1Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs, UK Government 21/5/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeed efficiency (FE) is recognized as a vital component of sustainable dairy production, with residual feed intake (RFI) serving as a key metabolic indicator of FE independent of production levels. However, the genetic improvement of this complex trait is limited by the inability of conventional genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (gBLUP) model to capture complex, non-linear genetic architectures and epistatic interactions. To address these limitations, this study aims to compare the predictive performance of machine learning (ML) approaches, specifically Random Forest (RF) and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) models, against standard gBLUP using genomic data from 220 UK Holstein cows genotyped with the BovineSNP50 v3 BeadChip with 47,446 quality-controlled single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), phenotyped for RFI from 1996-2023. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to interpret SNP feature importance from the ML models, and an ensemble framework was implemented to leverage the complementary strengths of RF and MLP.

resultsWhile the gBLUP model exhibited moderate predictive performance, the RF model demonstrated greater stability and accuracy compared to gBLUP, and the MLP showed higher variance across random states. The ensemble framework achieved the highest coefficient of determination (R

conclusionsThese results suggest that the genetic architecture of RFI may be explored by ML methods as they offer flexibility in mapping non-additive genetic effects. The reliability of genomic predictions for complex traits was enhanced when complementary computational strategies were leveraged in an ensemble framework, providing a focused set of candidate genes for future experimental validation. Whilst exploratory gene networks require validation in larger cohorts, the ensemble ML framework presented here offers an interpretable approach for dissecting the genetic architecture of complex production traits in livestock.

Indexed as

EnsembleFeed efficiencyGenomic predictionMachine learningMulti-Layer PerceptronRandom ForestSHapley Additive exPlanations

Identifiers

PMID42568092
PMCPMC13452126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.