ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Shared and unique neural correlates of reappraisal generation and implementation.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive reappraisal is an effective emotion regulation strategy that involves changing the meaning of an emotional event to alter one's emotional experience. Experimental studies have identified two dissociable subprocesses within reappraisal: the generation of candidate reappraisals (reappraisal generation) and the elaboration on a reappraisal to change emotion (reappraisal implementation). We examined the shared and unique neural correlates of these two reappraisal subprocesses. Participants (N = 45) completed the validated GenImp task while fMRI BOLD data was collected. In this task, participants viewed emotional images and, in separate steps, generated possible reappraisals and then implemented those reappraisals to feel better. Both generation and implementation engaged executive and semantic networks, while generation preferentially recruited ventral semantic pathways supporting conceptual analysis and flexible meaning construction. In contrast, implementation involved greater engagement of dorsal and self-referential regions supporting attentional control, elaboration, and emotional modulation, accompanied by stronger Executive Control Network - Default Mode Network (DMN) anticorrelation and DMN suppression. Together, these findings highlight a functional shift during reappraisal, starting with flexible semantic construction (generation), and then to top-down regulatory control (implementation), illuminating how executive, semantic, and self-referential systems dynamically interact to achieve successful emotion regulation in cognitive reappraisal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42568034What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.