ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
The diverse relationship between self-prioritization effect and emotional valence: Self-positivity bias and self-negative repulsion.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the self-positivity bias (SPB) suggests a preferential association with positive valence, emerging evidence indicates a more robust self-interaction with negativity. We propose self-negativity repulsion (SNR)-an active avoidance mechanism-as a distinct process complementing SPB. Using a novel nonsemantic paradigm, we examined the bidirectional influence between self-relevance (self, stranger, none) and emotional valence (positive, negative, neutral) across two tasks: one assessing emotional valence's impact on self-processing (Social Task), the other vice versa (Emotional Task). Analyses of behavioral (RTs) and electrophysiological data (ERPs, MVPC) revealed a dissociation. Positive valence yielded no behavioral benefits but showed subtle neural facilitation (e.g., enhanced decoding, distinct connectivity), suggesting a processing saturation effect. Conversely, negative valence consistently impaired behavior (slower RTs, reduced SPE). This was accompanied by a two-stage neural pattern: initial vigilance (a larger P2) followed by late-stage processing disruption (a reduced LPP). These findings provide converging evidence for dissociable SPB and SNR mechanisms. We suggest a dual-component model where SPB facilitates early processing and integration of positive self-information, while a distinct SNR mechanism actively modulates or inhibits negative self-information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42568031What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.