ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
The Changing Landscape of Global Biopharmaceutical Leadership, 2004-2024.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For several decades, the United States (U.S.) has been the leader in biopharmaceutical advancements. Recently, the U.S. has increased government interventions to limit prices for patent-protected medicines. While it is unclear whether ongoing efforts to implement international reference pricing in the U.S. could have similar effects, descriptive measures of global biopharmaceutical market dynamics can help benchmark future assessments. In this analysis, we analyzed trends in the geographic distribution of select measures of biopharmaceutical leadership from 2004 through 2024. Using the PharmaProjects database from Citeline, we found that 43.1% of first launches of small-molecule and biologic drugs occurred in the U.S., 15.3% occurred in Europe, and 9.9% occurred in China. Over this time, the share of drugs launched first in the U.S. went from 45.9 to 37.8%, the share of drugs launched first in Europe fell from 26.7 to 8.5%, while this share in China grew from 3.3 to 28.7%. The share of first-launched therapeutics developed by U.S.-headquartered companies and by companies based in Europe declined while the share developed by companies based in China increased. Though additional research is needed on the measurement of biopharmaceutical leadership, and impacts of government intervention, this descriptive study suggests that over several decades, there has been a strong decline in European measures of leadership. At the same time, China is becoming increasingly important in the global biopharmaceutical space. This analysis supports the view that the U.S remains a leader, and offers a benchmark and context for future evaluations that consider potential unintended consequences of ongoing proposals to increase government intervention in the prices of patent-protected medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42568029What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.