ReviewDrugs2026
Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Biology, Translational Science and Clinical Innovation.
Review in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is widely considered one of the most aggressive human malignancies, characterized by development of rapid metastases and eventual resistance to platinum chemotherapy and immunotherapy. For decades, despite rigorous scientific investigation and well-established mouse models providing a basis for mechanistic understanding, there were limited therapeutic advances for SCLC. The past decade has seen reinvigoration of drug development for SCLC as well as US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager with unprecedented survival advantage in this recalcitrant disease. Multiple other promising clinical trials in the first and later-line settings are underway that seek to challenge standards of first-line chemoimmunotherapy, investigate combination treatments in the later line, and introduce T-cell engagers earlier in treatment. This review provides a comprehensive primer on the biology and molecular landscape of SCLC, in the context of how both shape ongoing investigational strategies. A broad overview of established multidisciplinary management of both limited-stage and extensive-stage SCLC is discussed to provide understanding of how the next decade is likely to bring significant clinical gains as emerging therapeutics seek to redefine the management of SCLC and build upon novel advances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.