Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568024›Full record

ReviewBiologia futura2026

Glomalin and soil health: current understanding, ecological functions, and research frontiers.

Meenakshi Singh, Pradeep Kumar Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biologia futura, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meenakshi SinghDepartment of Environmental Studies, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1266-3584
Pradeep Kumar SinghDepartment of Botany, Akal College of Basic Sciences, Eternal University, Baru Sahib, Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh, India. singhpk@hotmail.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5257-4204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glomalin-related soil proteins (GRSP) are operationally defined soil fractions associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and are widely studied for their contributions to soil structure, carbon dynamics, and ecosystem functioning. Since its discovery, GRSP has attracted considerable attention because of its association with soil aggregation, carbon stabilization, and ecosystem sustainability. Glomalin, has been associated with various soil attributes, including the stability of soil aggregates, the size of soil carbon and nitrogen reservoirs, the sequestration of heavy metals, and the mitigation of diverse plant stresses. While GRSP concentrations in soil have often been correlated with AMF biomass measured through alternative (microscopic) methods, the chemical composition of GRSP extracted from soil remains intricate and not fully understood. This complexity arises from the nonspecific nature of its extraction and purification processes, as well as the diverse array of analytical techniques employed thus far to evaluate it. Current evidence suggests that GRSP contributes to soil organic carbon stabilization primarily through its association with soil aggregates. In this review, we endeavor to synthesize and explore various facets of glomalin, encompassing its composition, production mechanisms, soil-related functions, recalcitrant properties, and its potential role in the sequestration and stabilization of soil carbon.

Indexed as

Arbuscular mycorrhizaCarbon sequestrationGlomalinSoil healthSoil protein

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.