ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Impact of tranexamic acid on outcomes in early-admitted patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) represents one of the acute neurological conditions associated with the highest morbidity and mortality, often complicated by early rebleeding in the hyperacute phase. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, has been proposed to reduce the risk of rebleeding; however, its impact on outcomes in patients admitted early (≤ 72 h) remains unclear. The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials evaluating TXA use among aSAH patients admitted early to the hospital (≤ 72 h). The authors performed a traditional frequentist and Bayesian meta-analyses with informative priors for heterogeneity. Additionally, studies were stratified by whether they used a long-term or short-term TXA protocol. After a comprehensive search, 6 randomized trials were included in this review. Bayesian meta-analysis showed a significant reduction of rebleeding events (RR 0.59; 95% CrI 0.38 to 0.90) and rebleeding-related mortality (RR 0.55; 95% CrI 0.33 to 0.93) in the TXA cohort. Notably, the long-term TXA protocol subgroup showed a significant increase in cerebral ischemia events (RR 1.68; 95% CrI 1.13 to 2.51), while the short-term protocol did not yield a significant increase (96.3% probability of subgroup difference). There was no significant difference in overall-cause mortality (RR 1.01; 95% CrI 0.83 to 1.24), and poor neurological outcome at last follow-up (RR 1.02; 95% CrI 0.79 to 1.29). This study suggests that the use of TXA in early aSAH may reduce the incidence of rebleeding and rebleeding-related mortality. However, the impact of TXA does not directly translate into reduced all-cause mortality or enhanced neurological outcome. Long-term TXA protocols may increase potential ischemic complications and are not recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42568002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.