ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Forensic facial approximation methodologies applied to the Brazilian population: a scoping review.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review aimed to map forensic facial approximation (FFA) methodologies applied to the Brazilian population. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework and adopted the following structure: Population, human; Concept, FFA methodologies; and Context, studies conducted in the Brazilian population. Searches were conducted in seven databases and grey literature up to December 2025. No restrictions were applied regarding publication date or language. The data collected included FFA methodology, sample size, sex, age, region of the country, skull acquisition method, reconstructed facial region, anatomical landmarks, cranial analysis, and facial reconstruction software. Thirty studies proposing new or adapted methodologies were included, totaling 3,239 evaluated samples, predominantly from adult populations and Southeast Brazil (83.3%). Craniofacial structures were obtained mainly through cone-beam computed tomography and facial reconstructions or assessment of facial soft tissue thickness (FSTT). Of these, 23 focused on FSTT and the inclusion of cutaneous appendages, while 7 investigated the dimensions and projection of the nose, mouth, and ears. The studies also examined variations according to sex, age, skeletal class, skin color, and nutritional status. Population biases and the persistence of few studies on the nose, eyes, mouth, and ears remain central challenges, as does the standardization of landmarks and the validation of FSTT tables. Thus, it is observed that the growth of the country's scientific output in FFA does not yet eliminate critical methodological gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.