ArticleScientific reports2026
Heavy metals incorporated-alkali-activated waste glass binder and foamed glass: phase composition, physicomechanical performance, and reaction mechanism.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the immobilization of hazardous witherite (BaCO₃) and zaratite (Ni₃(CO₃)(OH)₄·4 H₂O) as heavy-metal carbonates within alkali-activated systems subjected to thermal treatments. The objective was to compare alkali-activated waste-glass (WG) binders cured at 60 °C with foamed glass (FG) produced at 800 °C in terms of heavy-metal stabilization, phase evolution, physicomechanical performance, and thermal insulation. WG was replaced with 10 or 30 wt% carbonate; specimens were cured at 60 °C for 3 days and subsequently heated at 800 °C for 2 h. TG/DTG, XRD, FTIR, physicomechanical, thermal-conductivity, pore-structure, and acid-leaching analyses were performed. Witherite caused only a modest strength reduction, whereas 10 and 30 wt% zaratite reduced the compressive strength of cured binders by approximately 37% and 84%, respectively. Despite immobilization efficiencies exceeding 99%, Ba²⁺ and Ni²⁺ concentrations in the leachates remained above the permissible thresholds. At 800 °C, a 10 wt% dosage promoted foaming, producing approximately six-fold volume expansion and thermal conductivities of 0.09-0.12 W·m⁻¹·K⁻¹, whereas 30 wt% inhibited foaming. Unlike the cured binders, witherite and zaratite in FG transformed into acid-resistant barium and nickel silicates, principally sanbornite (BaSi₂O₅) and liebenbergite (Ni₂SiO₄). Consequently, Ba²⁺ and Ni²⁺ concentrations released from all FG samples were below the regulated limits and 300-500 times lower than those from the corresponding cured binders. This dual function of high-load heavy-metal carbonates as foaming constituents and precursors of stable silicates enables hazardous-metal stabilization and the production of lightweight thermal-insulation materials from waste glass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.