Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567943›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2026

Neural circuits for mammalian parental behaviour.

Bradley B Jamieson, Johannes Kohl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bradley B JamiesonState-dependent Neural Processing Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2829-4488
Johannes KohlState-dependent Neural Processing Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. jonny.kohl@crick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8222-0282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most mammalian offspring are born helpless and depend on sustained parental care for survival, making caregiving one of the most conserved and essential behavioural repertoires in mammals. Yet infant-directed behaviours can be remarkably variable, ranging from care to neglect and aggression, even within the same individual. How neural circuits support both the robustness and the flexibility of parental behaviour remains poorly understood. Here we review recent advances in our understanding of the neural mechanisms of mammalian caregiving, placing circuit-level insights from rodent models into the broader context of parental diversity across mammals. Emerging evidence indicates that internal state and social experience dynamically reshape parental circuits across timescales from hours to weeks and that these circuits adapt their function to generate life stage-appropriate behavioural output. Rather than acting as fixed control systems for instinctive actions, parental circuits are highly plastic and context dependent. Parental behaviour therefore provides a powerful model for understanding how neural circuits are reconfigured to meet changing behavioural demands.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalBrainMaternal BehaviorNerve NetNeural PathwaysPaternal BehaviorAnimalsHumansMammals

Identifiers

PMID42567943
PMCPMC7619500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.