ReviewPlanta2026
Recent physiological, genetic, and management perspectives on lodging resistance in rice.
Review in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionDeveloping climate-resilient, lodging-resistant rice requires integrating strong culm and root related genetics, high-throughput and trait-based phenotyping, and optimized agronomic practices. Coordinated use of molecular breeding, gene editing, and management strategies offers sustainable solutions to mitigate lodging under variable environments. Lodging is a major abiotic stress that significantly reduces grain yield and quality in rice, while also increasing vulnerability to pests. Human-induced intensification, including high planting densities, excessive nitrogen application, off-season sowing, and cultivation in upland areas, further increases rice susceptibility to lodging, posing a major management challenge. Sole reliance on the sd1 gene has proven insufficient for ensuring effective lodging resistance. This review examines the diverse factors influencing lodging susceptibility and resistance in rice, including morphological, physiological, biochemical, genetic, agronomic, and environmental aspects, and integrates current advances to guide future research and breeding strategies for lodging-resistant rice. Among these factors, the stem has emerged as a key tissue influencing lodging resistance. Advances in molecular breeding have identified several QTLs and genes, such as SCM1, SCM2, SCM3, SCM4, APO1, and prl4, that are associated with lodging resistance, enabling the use of marker-assisted selection in breeding programs. The review also discusses integrated strategies that combine advanced phenotyping tools, optimized agronomic practices, mathematical modelling, and genetic approaches including molecular breeding and gene editing to effectively develop lodging-resistant rice varieties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42567930What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.