ReviewClinical oral investigations2026
Precision periodontology in clinical practice: bridging omics and clinical decision-making.
Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecision periodontology integrates molecular diagnostics, genomics, and advanced imaging into clinical decision-making. Despite major advances in microbiome characterisation, host genetics, and inflammatory biomarkers, their translation into routine care remains limited.
objectivesTo critically appraise current evidence on microbiome-based profiling, genetic and epigenetic markers, host-response biomarkers, and three-dimensional imaging in periodontology, and to propose a conceptual decision-support framework linking diagnostic outputs to potential therapeutic actions and future implementation research. MATERIALS AND
methodsA narrative review searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (2010-2025) using terms related to precision periodontology, subgingival microbiome, periodontitis genetics and epigenetics, salivary and GCF biomarkers, aMMP-8, CBCT, risk assessment, and artificial intelligence. Priority was given to meta-analyses, systematic reviews, longitudinal studies, and guideline documents.
resultsMicrobiological testing has defined but narrow indications; single-SNP genotyping has not demonstrated clinical utility commensurate with cost; aMMP-8 point-of-care testing is among the most extensively investigated host-response tools and may have adjunctive value in selected monitoring and peri-implant scenarios; however, current evidence remains insufficient to support routine diagnostic implementation. CBCT may directly influence surgical decision-making through defect morphology characterisation. AI-based models show promise but lack prospective clinical validation. These conclusions are consistent with the 20th EFP Workshop Consensus Report.
conclusionsPrecision periodontology currently operates in addition to, rather than in replacement of, conventional staging and grading. We propose a conceptual decision-threshold framework for the selective consideration of molecular and advanced imaging tools when their additive contribution may meaningfully inform management. This framework should be regarded as a research-oriented decision-support model rather than a validated clinical algorithm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians are provided with a structured, evidence-based framework that identifies specific clinical scenarios where molecular diagnostics, host-response biomarkers, and three-dimensional imaging may meaningfully modify periodontal treatment decisions, supporting the operationalisation of precision approaches in daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42567900What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.