Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567887›Full record

ArticleBJC reports2026

Urinary volatilomics using liquid-liquid extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) combined with machine learning algorithms as a tool for diagnosis and surveillance of urothelial bladder cancer.

Ignacio Deza, Ben de Lacy Costello, Natalia Drabińska-Fois, Paul White, Norman Ratcliffe, Henry Lazarowicz, Chris Probert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJC reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ignacio DezaDepartment of Computer Science and Creative Technologies, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9551-9718
Ben de Lacy CostelloCentre for Biomedical Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, UK. Ben.DeLacyCostello@uwe.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2999-6801
Natalia Drabińska-FoisFood Volatilomics and Sensomics Group, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-5982
Paul WhiteDepartment of Engineering, Design and Mathematics, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-9896
Norman RatcliffeCentre for Biomedical Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4704-3123
Henry LazarowiczDepartment of Urology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0792-2983
Chris ProbertDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4550-0239

Funding

Cancer Research UK C45856/A21068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder cancer is the 11th most common cancer in the United Kingdom, with approximately 10,500 new cases annually. Diagnosis and surveillance typically involve cystoscopy, an expensive, time-consuming, and uncomfortable procedure which has encouraged efforts to identify biomarkers, particularly in urine, given its direct contact with malignant tissue.

methodsUrine collected from 100 participants (50 bladder cancer patients, 50 controls) was subjected to solvent extraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to determine potential volatile and semi-volatile biomarkers. The results were analysed using classical univariate statistics and machine learning methods. Five machine learning algorithms were evaluated, with recursive feature elimination (RFE) identifying optimal biomarker panels.

resultsMachine learning with XGBoost achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.740-0.988), representing a significant improvement over the classical statistical approach (AUROC 0.752). An 8-metabolite panel achieved balanced sensitivity and specificity of 85%, or 95% sensitivity with 70% specificity when optimised for screening.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that solvent extraction of urine shows promise for isolating putative biomarkers of bladder cancer. Employing machine learning achieved diagnostic accuracy potentially suitable for clinical deployment as a non-invasive bladder cancer detection tool.

Identifiers

PMID42567887
PMCPMC13451427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.