ArticleScientific reports2026
Towards prospective identification of optimal scan parameters for CT-guided interventions: a phantom study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CT-guided interventions require balance between radiation dose and image quality. This study evaluates the impact of tube voltage and tube load on the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) across different patient sizes and target tissues. A modular multi-energy phantom with effective diameters of 20 cm and 35 cm was used. Bone, iodine-blood mixture, and pure blood targets were scanned axially at matched dose levels. Images were equally reconstructed. For analysis, CNR was the primary metric. Tube voltages of 80, 100, 120 and 140 kVp were applied with corresponding mAs adjustments to achieve dose levels between 1 and 10 mGy SSDE (Size Specific Dose Estimate). In the small phantom, low kVp settings yielded the highest CNR for high-contrast targets like iodine. For low-contrast imaging, higher kVp settings were more beneficial. In the large phantom, higher kVp consistently improved CNR across all materials. E.g. raising kVp from 80 to 120 raised the CNR from 6.5 to 8.6 for the iodine-blood setup. In conclusion, for optimal image quality in CT-guided interventions, scan protocols must adapt tube voltage and tube load dynamically to the target tissue and patient size. Finding the sweet spot between contrast loss and noise reduction for increasing tube voltages is key for intervention planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.