Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567870›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Towards prospective identification of optimal scan parameters for CT-guided interventions: a phantom study.

Constantin Schareck, Neele Blumhoff, Malte M Sieren, Roman Kloeckner, Franz Wegner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Constantin SchareckInstitute for Interventional Radiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. constantin.schareck@uksh.de.ORCID 0009-0004-3893-8579
Neele BlumhoffInstitute for Interventional Radiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Malte M SierenInstitute for Interventional Radiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Roman KloecknerInstitute for Interventional Radiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Franz WegnerInstitute for Interventional Radiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CT-guided interventions require balance between radiation dose and image quality. This study evaluates the impact of tube voltage and tube load on the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) across different patient sizes and target tissues. A modular multi-energy phantom with effective diameters of 20 cm and 35 cm was used. Bone, iodine-blood mixture, and pure blood targets were scanned axially at matched dose levels. Images were equally reconstructed. For analysis, CNR was the primary metric. Tube voltages of 80, 100, 120 and 140 kVp were applied with corresponding mAs adjustments to achieve dose levels between 1 and 10 mGy SSDE (Size Specific Dose Estimate). In the small phantom, low kVp settings yielded the highest CNR for high-contrast targets like iodine. For low-contrast imaging, higher kVp settings were more beneficial. In the large phantom, higher kVp consistently improved CNR across all materials. E.g. raising kVp from 80 to 120 raised the CNR from 6.5 to 8.6 for the iodine-blood setup. In conclusion, for optimal image quality in CT-guided interventions, scan protocols must adapt tube voltage and tube load dynamically to the target tissue and patient size. Finding the sweet spot between contrast loss and noise reduction for increasing tube voltages is key for intervention planning.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaHumansRadiation DosageSignal-To-Noise RatioContrast MediaContrast to noise ratioInterventional radiologyMedical imagingRadiation protectionSize specific dose estimate

Identifiers

PMID42567870
PMCPMC13451489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.