Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567857›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Beyond the pelvic ring: benchmarking multi-bone segmentation for ROI-Guided fracture detection.

Siam Tahsin Bhuiyan, Rashedur Rahman, Sefatul Wasi, Halima Khatun, Manosh Sur Chowdhury, Riyadul Islam, Samiul Karim Mazumder, Naomi Yagi, Syoji Kobashi, Saadia Binte Alam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siam Tahsin BhuiyanCenter for Computational & Data Sciences, Independent University, Bangladesh, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0000-1298-1991
Rashedur RahmanCenter for Computational & Data Sciences, Independent University, Bangladesh, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-0267-2612
Sefatul WasiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Independent University, Bangladesh, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0004-6949-0607
Halima KhatunCenter for Computational & Data Sciences, Independent University, Bangladesh, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0008-9022-4441
Manosh Sur ChowdhuryCenter for Computational & Data Sciences, Independent University, Bangladesh, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0006-1601-5436
Riyadul IslamCenter for Computational & Data Sciences, Independent University, Bangladesh, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0007-8702-9330
Samiul Karim MazumderCenter for Computational & Data Sciences, Independent University, Bangladesh, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0009-1094-9993
Naomi YagiAdvanced Medical Engineering Research Institute, University of Hyogo, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2435-6509
Syoji KobashiAdvanced Medical Engineering Research Institute, University of Hyogo, Hyogo, Japan. kobashi@eng.u-hyogo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-3659-4114
Saadia Binte AlamCenter for Computational & Data Sciences, Independent University, Bangladesh, 1229, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0007-0358-7635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic fractures are critical injuries associated with high mortality rates, yet accurate diagnosis using conventional radiography remains challenging due to complex anatomical overlaps. This study evaluates the impact of segmentation-guided preprocessing on fracture detection from pelvic X-rays by introducing a Multi-Bone Segmentation Method. Unlike traditional approaches that restrict analysis to the pelvic ring or treat the pelvis as a single region, our framework utilizes a transformer-enhanced U-Net to distinctly isolate nine individual pelvic bones, creating an anatomically precise input for downstream classification. For segmentation, the model was trained on PXR150 and evaluated on both PXR150 and externally on AMERI PXR, while classification models were trained and evaluated separately for each dataset. We benchmarked this approach against three methods: a Conventional (raw X-ray input) baseline, a Conventional ROI-Guided Method (binary segmentation), and a Reference Segmentation (manual annotation) to establish a performance upper bound. Using the public PXR150 and private AMERI PXR datasets, we demonstrated that segmentation-guided analysis consistently enhances diagnostic precision. The Proposed Multi-Bone Method outperformed the Conventional ROI-Guided Method, achieving higher Accuracy (81.30%, 95% CI: 79.70-82.90 and 83.20%, 95% CI: 78.74-87.66) and AUROC (0.822, 95% CI: 0.794-0.851 and 0.838, 95% CI: 0.792-0.884) across both datasets. By effectively filtering non-anatomical artifacts, the multi-bone strategy achieved performance metrics close to the manually annotated reference standard. GradCAM visualizations further confirmed that multi-bone segmentation aligns model activation with clinically relevant fracture sites, enhancing interpretability. These findings underscore that anatomical completeness in segmentation is a decisive factor in improving the reliability and explainability of automated fracture detection systems.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPelvic BonesAlgorithmsBenchmarkingHumansAMERI PXRDeep learningMedical image analysisMulti-bone segmentationPelvic fracture classificationPelvic X-rayPXR150ROI-guided detectionSegmentation-guided analysis

Identifiers

PMID42567857
PMCPMC13451365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.