Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567848›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

Data-usage descriptors as search metadata: the case of food security data and the National Data Platform.

Lauren Chenarides, Rafael Ladislau, Natasha Noy, Manish Parashar, Simon Porter, Julia Lane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren ChenaridesColorado State University, Fort Collins, USA. Lauren.chenarides@colostate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8983-9694
Rafael LadislauDuranium, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rafa.ladis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3832-3362
Natasha NoyGoogle Research, Mountain View, USA. noy@google.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7437-0624
Manish ParasharUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. Manish.parashar@utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0983-7408
Simon PorterDigital Science, London, United Kingdom. S.porter@digital-science.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-8423
Julia LaneNew York University, New York, USA. Julia.lane@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8139-2960

Funding

Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences 49100422C0028national science foundation 2333609National Science Foundation 2440195NIEHS NIH HHS 27302C0028U.S. Department of Agriculture 58-5000-8-0053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific data is a critical input into scientific research. Yet the research data landscape is constantly changing as new datasets emerge, others are retired, or some disappear altogether. Without a systematic way to track how datasets are used across a research field, researchers have no reliable method for identifying relevant data resources or locating communities that work with them. Data-usage descriptors can substantially advance research productivity by reducing the time that researchers spend finding new and relevant datasets in their research field, and the communities that use them. This paper describes how to generate data-usage descriptors by finding how datasets are used in publications and then linking the dataset information to the publication metadata. It also shows how usage descriptors can be used to find other related datasets and their usage. It concludes by arguing that the approach represents a critical piece of foundational infrastructure that could be deployed in repositories as part of a referenceable, navigable, and contextual data framework. This article contains a reproducible workflow for constructing data-usage descriptors, based on analyzing the full text of publications in the Dimensions database. The illustrative use case is research on food security. The illustrative repository is the National Data Platform.

Identifiers

PMID42567848
PMCPMC13451421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.