Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567688›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2026

Human-AI Interaction With AI-Assisted Tumor Overlays in Pediatric Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Exploratory Reader Study.

Abhishek Moturu, Olurotimi Komolafe, Sayali Joshi, Andrea S Doria, Anna Goldenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhishek Moturu *Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 40 St George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2E4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0332-6324
Olurotimi Komolafe *Department of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2524-8152
Sayali JoshiDepartment of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3199-168X
Andrea S DoriaDepartment of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3202-0447
Anna GoldenbergDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 40 St George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2E4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2416-833X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: AI tools have the potential to enhance personalized clinical care, particularly in radiology. However, their integration into clinical workflows remains complex, especially in pediatric oncology, where early cancer detection is critical. Children with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), a rare cancer predisposition disorder, undergo regular surveillance whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wbMRI), which presents an opportunity for AI-assisted tumor detection. Objective: We evaluated the feasibility of an AI-assisted overlay for highlighting tumor-like regions in pediatric surveillance wbMRI and explored how access to the overlay influenced radiologist workflow, candidate-lesion marking behavior, follow-up recommendations, and perceived workload. Methods: We developed a patch-based AI segmentation model trained on augmented 2D slices from 675 surveillance wbMRI volumes of pediatric patients with LFS. The model was designed to highlight regions with high tumor probability. A reader study was conducted with 2 radiologists who independently reviewed wbMRI cases both with and without AI assistance. We measured evaluation time, number and location of reader-marked candidate lesions, type of follow-up recommendation, and subjective feedback using structured questionnaires. Results: AI assistance altered interpretation workflows for both radiologists, with mixed effects. On average, the time required to evaluate each case increased when using the AI tool for both radiologists. However, one radiologist had an increase in the number of candidate lesion locations selected with the tool, and one had a decrease in the number of candidate lesion locations selected with the tool. Subjective feedback indicated that one of the radiologists reported lower mental demand with the AI tool, while both radiologists reported lower stress with the AI tool. Interrater variability was evident, underscoring the need for personalized calibration of AI tools. Conclusions: AI-assisted wbMRI interpretation can improve tumor detection in pediatric cancer surveillance by reducing false negatives. However, its influence on workflow efficiency and interradiologist variability highlights the importance of careful implementation. Successful integration requires addressing challenges such as improving the predictive precision of AI models, offering intuitive end-user designs and instructions, and building trust in AI outputs. AI outputs can influence workflow and behavior in reader-specific ways. Clinical translation will require larger, randomized, multireader studies and model refinement to reduce false positives and quantify lesion-level reader performance. This can help ensure better patient outcomes in addition to reduced clinician burnout.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLi-Fraumeni SyndromeMagnetic Resonance ImagingWhole Body ImagingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalehuman-AI interactioninterpretability in AILi-Fraumeni syndromemachine learningpediatric oncologyradiologysegmentationtumor detectionwbMRIwhole-body magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID42567688
PMCPMC13451057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.