Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567687›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Behavioral Characteristics of Medical Students on Social Media Platforms: Topic Modeling and Social Network Analysis.

Yongjie Li, Yangshan Fu, Fenshuang Zheng, Xiangyu Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yongjie LiHealth Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4811-3947
Yangshan FuThe Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, No. 176 Qingnian Road, Kunming, Yunnan, China, 86 0871-63627114.ORCID 0009-0004-6031-1908
Fenshuang Zheng *The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, No. 176 Qingnian Road, Kunming, Yunnan, China, 86 0871-63627114.ORCID 0009-0005-1645-2022
Xiangyu Yan *School of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1496-0358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical students experience sustained academic, clinical, and psychosocial pressures. Online forums provide an informal space where students seek information, express concerns, and exchange peer support. However, few studies have analyzed these interactions longitudinally based on real-world data from online social platforms. Objective: This study aimed to integrate topic modeling, temporal topic analysis, and social network analysis (SNA) to investigate evolving concerns, network positions, and influence structures within the bulletin board system of a medical university over a 7-year period. Methods: We collected all posts and comments from the "Medical Center" board of the Peking University bulletin board system forum between 2017 and 2023. After excluding irrelevant posts, nontextual elements, blank content, and noise terms, the textual corpus was segmented and standardized for analysis. Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) was used for topic modeling to identify primary discussion topics. The number of topics was selected through 5-fold cross-validation by evaluating candidate models with 5 to 20 topics using perplexity. Annual topic prevalence was calculated to examine temporal changes in student concerns. SNA was also used to construct interaction networks. Users were defined as nodes, and directed edges were established when one user replied to another user's post or comment. Degree centrality, eigenvector centrality, and betweenness centrality were calculated to identify active users, influential hubs, and bridging users. A topic-network coupling analysis further linked topic categories with the centrality measures of users. Results: The corpus included 4639 posts and 58,942 comments. The annual post numbers fluctuated over the years, reaching their lowest point in 2019 and peaking in 2022. Posting activity increased after 8 AM, remained relatively stable from noon to 10 PM, and declined after 10 PM. Seven major topics of concern were identified, with feedback on living facilities (1025/4639, 22.1%) being the most prevalent, followed by information inquiry (1004/4639, 21.6%) and medical education (883/4639, 19.0%). Temporal analysis showed that concerns related to living facilities remained a recurring topic across years, and emotional support remained a low-frequency but persistent topic. The overall network was sparse, with a small subset of users occupying active, influential, or bridging positions. Topic-network coupling showed that high-volume topics were not necessarily network-central: feedback on living facilities had the largest discussion volume but the lowest median centrality values, whereas current affairs had the highest median degree and eigenvector centrality, and psychological and emotional support had the highest median betweenness centrality. Conclusions: Online forums can reveal not only what students discuss but also how concerns persist, change, and circulate through peer interaction networks. Combining topic modeling with network analysis may help educational administrators identify persistent concerns related to the learning environment, time-sensitive issues, and structurally important topics requiring targeted communication or support strategies.

Indexed as

Social MediaSocial Network AnalysisStudents, MedicalDigital MediaHumansSocial Supportmedical educationmedical studentsonline communitiessocial network analysistopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID42567687
PMCPMC13451059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.