ArticleLife science alliance2026
Structural interplay of the redox co-chaperone CnoX to GroEL/ES chaperonin.
Article in Life science alliance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein folding by the bacterial chaperonin GroEL/ES relies on ATP-driven conformational cycles that promote substrate encapsulation and folding. Under oxidative stress, the redox-active co-chaperone CnoX protects oxidized proteins and associates with GroEL, yet the structural basis of its interaction with the GroEL/ES remains incompletely understood. Using single-particle cryo-electron microscopy, we resolved four distinct nucleotide-bound conformational states of CnoX-associated GroEL/ES complexes. CnoX remains tethered to GroEL through its C-terminal TPR domain despite substantial rearrangements of the GroEL apical domains. We further captured a GroEL/ES-CnoX ternary assembly in which CnoX and GroES simultaneously occupy the same GroEL ring, demonstrating that their binding sites are structurally distinct and non-overlapping. Comparison of two GroES-bound states reveals how apical-domain compaction occludes the CnoX-binding surface and coincides with loss of CnoX from the cis-ring. Together, these structures define how CnoX is accommodated and excluded across distinct GroEL/ES conformations and provide a structural framework for understanding the interplay between redox co-chaperones and chaperonin assemblies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.