Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567642›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2026

Intraepithelial serous carcinoma of the endometrium: protocol for a prospective multicentre registry in the Netherlands.

F Ciska Slaager, Klaas J Hoogduin, Ward Hofhuis, Floris H Groenendijk, Heleen J van Beekhuizen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06677242 (Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06677242 not yet recruitingnot on this map

Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Carcinoma (SEIC): Prospective Registration Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2025 to 2035Enrolled100ConditionsSerous Endometrial Intraepithalial Carcinoma, SEICArmsBlood sample (serum) for circulating tumor DNA and cervical smear for genome-wide methylation sequencing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

F Ciska SlaagerGynaecological Oncology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands f.slaager@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-6536-7522
Klaas J HoogduinDepartment of Pathology, Pathan BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ward HofhuisDepartment of Gynaecology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Floris H GroenendijkPathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-561X
Heleen J van BeekhuizenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8899-7412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSerous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is a rare, non-invasive lesion of the endometrial epithelium, typically characterised by p53 abnormalities. Although regarded as a precursor lesion, recent classification systems increasingly position SEIC within the broader spectrum of serous carcinomas and current guidelines place non-invasive p53-abnormal serous lesions in an uncertain risk category due to limited outcome data. As a result, SEIC is not consistently addressed as a distinct diagnosis, contributing to variation in clinical management. Complete surgical staging, including pelvic and para-aortic lymph node assessment, is frequently performed, yet supporting evidence remains scarce. This study aims to collect longitudinal data to evaluate surgical management strategies in relation to clinical outcomes, survival and quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre prospective observational cohort will enrol patients diagnosed with SEIC or equivalent non-invasive serous lesions who provide informed consent. Data will be collected using electronic case report forms (Castor Electronic Data Capture). Baseline clinical, pathological, molecular and treatment data will be collected, including imaging, histopathology, immunohistochemistry and molecular classification when available. Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-EN24) and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires at baseline, 6 months, 2 years and 5 years after diagnosis. The primary outcome is progression-free survival, secondary outcomes include overall survival, health-related quality of life and adverse events. Analyses will be primarily descriptive. Survival outcomes will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, with Cox proportional hazards modelling used to explore predictors of outcome where feasible. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable regulations. Ethical approval was obtained at the Erasmus MC (MEC-2025-0368). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06677242.

Indexed as

Carcinoma in SituCystadenocarcinoma, SerousEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNetherlandsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRegistriesResearch DesignCancerGynaecological oncologyHistopathology

Identifiers

PMID42567642
PMCPMC13475400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.