Observational studyBMJ open2026
Intraepithelial serous carcinoma of the endometrium: protocol for a prospective multicentre registry in the Netherlands.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06677242 (Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Carcinoma (SEIC): Prospective Registration Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSerous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is a rare, non-invasive lesion of the endometrial epithelium, typically characterised by p53 abnormalities. Although regarded as a precursor lesion, recent classification systems increasingly position SEIC within the broader spectrum of serous carcinomas and current guidelines place non-invasive p53-abnormal serous lesions in an uncertain risk category due to limited outcome data. As a result, SEIC is not consistently addressed as a distinct diagnosis, contributing to variation in clinical management. Complete surgical staging, including pelvic and para-aortic lymph node assessment, is frequently performed, yet supporting evidence remains scarce. This study aims to collect longitudinal data to evaluate surgical management strategies in relation to clinical outcomes, survival and quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre prospective observational cohort will enrol patients diagnosed with SEIC or equivalent non-invasive serous lesions who provide informed consent. Data will be collected using electronic case report forms (Castor Electronic Data Capture). Baseline clinical, pathological, molecular and treatment data will be collected, including imaging, histopathology, immunohistochemistry and molecular classification when available. Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-EN24) and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires at baseline, 6 months, 2 years and 5 years after diagnosis. The primary outcome is progression-free survival, secondary outcomes include overall survival, health-related quality of life and adverse events. Analyses will be primarily descriptive. Survival outcomes will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, with Cox proportional hazards modelling used to explore predictors of outcome where feasible. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable regulations. Ethical approval was obtained at the Erasmus MC (MEC-2025-0368). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06677242.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.