Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567633›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Prospective cohort study of unselected nulliparous women with a nested randomised controlled trial of screening using the sFLT1:PlGF ratio, ultrasound and maternal characteristics and intervention using enhanced monitoring and early delivery: study protocol for the POPS2 cohort and randomised controlled trial.

Gordon C S Smith, Amy Sutton-Cole, Ellen Dyer, Ulla Sovio, Emma Cook, Ian R White, D Stephen Charnock-Jones

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gordon C S SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK gcss2@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2124-0997
Amy Sutton-ColeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ellen DyerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ulla SovioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Emma CookDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ian R WhiteClinical Trials & Methodology, University College London Faculty of Population Health Sciences, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6718-7661
D Stephen Charnock-JonesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2936-4890

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 215524/Z/19/ZWellcome Trust 3184828 GBP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent UK guidelines recommend measurement of symphyseal fundal height and measurement of maternal blood pressure and urinalysis, with the aim of detecting women at increased risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR) and pre-eclampsia. Between 2008 and 2013, we conducted a prospective cohort study recruiting 4512 nulliparous women at the Rosie Hospital, Cambridge, where we performed serial ultrasonic imaging and serial blood sampling and generated a novel screening test for pre-eclampsia and FGR. The method involved measuring the ratio of two placental biomarkers (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor-1 and placenta growth factor) at ~36 weeks of gestational age (wkGA) and combining the result with maternal characteristics and ultrasonic imaging. Women who screened positive had a ~50% risk of a composite outcome, consisting of pre-eclampsia±delivery of a baby with a birth weight <3rd percentile for sex and gestational age±perinatal morbidity or death. It is plausible that screening and intervention using this method might improve pregnancy outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Nulliparous women with an apparently normal singleton pregnancy will be recruited at their dating ultrasound scan. Blood will be obtained at this visit, at their anomaly scan (20 wkGA), and at two research appointments (28 wkGA and 36 wkGA) when research ultrasound scans will be performed. Blood for DNA will be obtained from the father of the baby where possible and the placenta will be sampled following birth. At 36 wkGA, women will be consented for participation in the randomised controlled trial (RCT) element of the study and their risk of term pre-eclampsia and FGR will be assessed using the novel approach. Women who screen high-risk will then be randomly allocated to either having the result revealed or masked. Women randomised to having the result revealed will be offered early delivery and/or enhanced monitoring. Where the result is masked, there will be no communication between the research team and the participant, and she will continue to receive routine care at the Rosie Hospital. The primary outcome is a composite of pre-eclampsia, FGR and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The study will also generate data and biological samples to support future research in novel screening methods and disease mechanisms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received ethical approval from the East of England Research Ethics Committee. All women provide written informed consent to participate in the cohort. Women provide a second written informed consent to participate in the RCT. The study results will be disseminated by presentation at international conferences and publication in peer reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN1218142.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationPlacenta Growth FactorPre-EclampsiaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1BiomarkersFemaleGestational AgeHumansParityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUltrasonography, PrenatalBiomarkersFLT1 protein, humanPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1Mass ScreeningOBSTETRICSRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID42567633
PMCPMC13475102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.