ArticleBMJ global health2026
Where and why malaria persists in heterogeneous transmission settings: insights from routine health facility data.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalaria distribution in sub-Saharan Africa is becoming increasingly spatially heterogeneous. Pre-elimination areas, high-transmission settings and urban areas with increasing transmission may all coexist within the same country. Effective intervention planning requires identifying high-risk areas and their drivers-an area in which geospatial models can provide valuable insights. Yet these models often assume stationary risk factors across transmission levels and frequently rely on prevalence survey data, which are unreliable in low-transmission settings. This study uses routine public-sector health facility data (ie, DHIS2) to model malaria incidence in Senegal from 2017 to 2021, accounting for transmission levels, and introduces novel fine-scale estimates of reported malaria incidence derived from dasymetric disaggregation.
methodsHealth facility catchment populations were estimated using a probabilistic approach, allowing individuals to attend multiple facilities based on relative travel time. Malaria incidence per catchment was modelled using high-resolution environmental and socioeconomic covariates within a Bayesian hierarchical modelling framework. Separate models were fitted by season and endemicity-urbanisation level to assess the heterogeneity of risk factors. We adapted dasymetric disaggregation methods from population mapping to redistribute facility-level cases to 1 km pixels.
resultsEstimated malaria incidence increased from 60 cases per 1000 people in 2017 to 71 cases in 2021. Key risk factors varied across endemicity-urbanisation levels; some factors were uniquely associated with low (eg, distance to roads), moderate (eg, cropland) and high-transmission settings (eg, flooded vegetation). Fine-scale maps represent malaria cases that the public-sector health system routinely reports, rather than the total malaria burden, and revealed potential underdiagnosis in remote areas.
conclusionsOur findings emphasise the importance of considering endemicity levels when evaluating malaria risk factors in heterogeneous transmission contexts. As health system data quality continues to improve, this approach offers a scalable alternative for mapping reported malaria incidence, supporting better targeted interventions and the identification of underdiagnosed areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.