Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567531›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2026

Heterogeneous Associations Between Frequent Virtual Communication and Loneliness Among Older Adults: Observational Analysis.

Daisuke Kato, Ichiro Kawachi, Katsunori Kondo, Atsushi Nakagomi, Koichiro Shiba

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daisuke KatoTakemi Program in International Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2449-0548
Ichiro KawachiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9339-2821
Katsunori KondoCenter for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-816X
Atsushi NakagomiCenter for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-696X
Koichiro ShibaDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7956-6485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoneliness is a long-standing and widely acknowledged public health problem among older adults, yet evidence remains mixed regarding how virtual communication is associated with loneliness. Less is known about whether this association varies across baseline profiles among older adults.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the association between frequent virtual communication with family, friends, or acquaintances and loneliness among older adults in Japan and explore whether this association varied across baseline profiles.

methodsUsing linked 2019 and 2022 data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, we conducted an observational analysis of community-dwelling Japanese adults aged 65 years or older (N=4807). Baseline covariates were measured in 2019. Frequent virtual communication was assessed in 2022 based on retrospective reports of internet or email use for communication with family, friends, or acquaintances in the preceding year; frequent use was defined as use at least 2 to 3 times per week. Participants not meeting this definition were categorized as nonusers or infrequent users. Loneliness was measured in 2022 using the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale (range 3-9). We used targeted maximum likelihood estimation with SuperLearner and 42 baseline covariates to estimate the sample average-adjusted association and a generalized random forest approach to explore heterogeneity in the estimated association across baseline profiles. Supplementary analyses examined baseline loneliness adjustment in an alternative linked sample, a dichotomized loneliness outcome, propensity score overlap, and model calibration.

resultsThe analytic sample included 4807 participants, of whom 1616 (33.6%) met the frequent virtual communication definition. After adjusting for observed baseline covariates, frequent virtual communication was associated with a difference of -0.136 in loneliness scores (95% CI -0.194 to -0.078). Generalized random forest analyses suggested exploratory heterogeneity in the estimated association across baseline profiles; most individual-level forest predictions for the estimated association were below 0 (4519/4807, 94.0%). In supplementary analyses, the association remained in the same direction after adjustment for baseline loneliness in an alternative linked sample (adjusted mean difference -0.117, 95% CI -0.173 to -0.061) and when loneliness was dichotomized (odds ratio for loneliness 0.734, 95% CI 0.597-0.904). Propensity score diagnostics showed overlap between exposure groups, although overlap was limited in the tails.

conclusionsIn this observational analysis of older adults in Japan, frequent virtual communication was associated with modestly lower loneliness, and generalized random forest analyses suggested exploratory heterogeneity across baseline profiles. The findings should be interpreted cautiously because the exposure was retrospectively reported, loneliness was measured in the same survey wave, baseline loneliness was not available in the main analytic sample, and sample selection may have affected generalizability. The findings should not be interpreted as evidence of causal effects.

Indexed as

CommunicationLonelinessAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJapanMaleheterogeneityhuman-computer interactionlonelinessmachine learningobservational studyolder adults

Identifiers

PMID42567531
PMCPMC13498908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.