ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2026
Determinants of substrate specificity in mint pulegone reductase, a double bond reductase of the medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase superfamily.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulegone reductase from peppermint (Mentha × piperita; MpPulR) is an NADPH-dependent medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase that catalyzes the asymmetric reduction of the C4-C7 double bond of (+)-pulegone to (-)-menthone and (+)-isomenthone. To define the structural determinants of substrate recognition and catalytic turnover, we integrated structure-based modeling (docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations) with experimental mutagenesis and comprehensive substrate profiling. Residues positioned closely to (+)-pulegone in homology-based structural models were subjected to L-Ala-scanning mutagenesis. Four substitutions (Y53A, F66A, Y78A, Y257A) caused severe activity losses, consistent with a binding pocket in which Y78 supports carbonyl anchoring via hydrogen bonding and aromatic residues (Y53, F66, and Y257) creating a hydrophobic cavity that enforces a productive substrate orientation. Other residues, including L56, I63, M135, F281, and V282, line the perimeter of the active-site cavity, thus providing architectural constraints for substrate binding. Screening of 40 candidate monoterpenoids revealed measurable activity with only six substrates, and kinetic analysis demonstrated exceptionally high catalytic efficiency toward piperitenone and piperitenone oxide, moderate efficiency with (+)-pulegone, and lower efficiency with citral, (-)-pulegone, and isoegomaketone. MD simulations of productive versus non-productive ligands indicated binding requirements that include stable carbonyl-Y78 hydrogen bonding, enzyme-ligand complex stability, and favorable cofactor-double bond alignment. Finally, an essential oil survey across diverse accessions of the genus Mentha and functional characterization of 2 Mentha longifolia orthologs indicate that MpPulR-like enzymes are promiscuous reductases likely contributing to the interspecific diversification of essential oil profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.