Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42567158›Full record

ArticleNeuron2026

Inferring brain-wide interactions using data-constrained recurrent neural network models.

Matthew G Perich, Charlotte Arlt, Sofia Soares, Siyan Zhou, Manuel Beiran, Aaron S Andalman, Tyler Benster, Megan E Young, Clayton P Mosher, Juri Minxha and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. InputDSA : Demixing then comparing recurrent and externally driven dynamics.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bridging the gap between the connectome and whole-brain activity inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Context rescales a social action code in a hormone-sensitive network.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Matthew G PerichDépartement des neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (Mila), Montréal, QC, Canada.
Charlotte ArltDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Sofia SoaresDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Siyan ZhouDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Manuel BeiranZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Aaron S AndalmanDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Tyler BensterNeurosciences Graduate Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Megan E YoungNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Clayton P MosherNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Juri MinxhaCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Eugene CarterNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ueli RutishauserCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Peter H RudebeckNash Family Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Christopher D HarveyDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Karl DeisserothDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kanaka RajanDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Kempner Institute for Natural and Artificial Intelligence, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02134, USA. Electronic address: kanaka_rajan@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

Neuronal mechanisms of human episodic memoryU01NS117839 · NINDS · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAMELAK, ADAM NATHANIEL, RUTISHAUSER, UELI · 2020 to 2024
$7.8M
Toward mechanistic cognitive neuroscience: cell types, connectivity, and patterned perturbationsDP1MH125776 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARVEY, CHRISTOPHER D · 2020 to 2024
$5.9M
Neural circuit mechanisms of affective probabilistic learningR01MH132064 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Peter Rudebeck · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
Neural mechanisms of affective processing in prefrontal-limbic circuitsR01MH118638 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RUDEBECK, PETER · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
Single-neuron mechanisms of executive control of long-term memory processes in humansR01MH110831 · NIMH · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI RUTISHAUSER, UELI · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
Parietal Cortex Networks for Sensorimotor Processing During NavigationR37NS089521 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Christopher D Harvey · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
Neural Network Models Constrained by Multiscale Data to Infer Minimal Functional Motifs in the BrainRF1DA056403 · NIDA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RAJAN, KANAKA · 2022 to 2022
$1.2M
Multi-region 'Network of Networks' Recurrent Neural Network Models of Adaptive and Maladaptive LearningR01EB028166 · NIBIB · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RAJAN, KANAKA · 2019 to 2019
$1.2M
Relating structure and function in synapse-level wiring diagramsR01EB029858 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LITWIN-KUMAR, ASHOK · 2020 to 2020
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028166NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029858NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA056403NIMH NIH HHS DP1 MH125776NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110831NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118638NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH132064NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS089521NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS117839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavior arises from the coordinated activity across anatomically and functionally distinct brain regions. Modern experimental tools allow unprecedented access to large neural populations spanning many interacting regions brain-wide. Yet, understanding such large-scale datasets necessitates robust, scalable computational models to extract meaningful features of inter-region communication and principled theories to interpret those features. Here, we introduce current-based decomposition (CURBD), an approach for inferring brain-wide interactions using data-constrained recurrent neural network models that autonomously produce dynamics consistent with experimentally obtained neural data. CURBD leverages the functional interactions inferred from such models to reveal directional currents between multiple brain regions simultaneously. We first show that CURBD accurately isolates inter-region currents in simulated, ground-truth networks with known connectivity and dynamics. We then apply CURBD to multi-region neural recordings obtained from many species-larval zebrafish, mice, macaques, and humans-to demonstrate the widespread applicability of CURBD in untangling brain-wide interactions and inter-area communication principles underlying behavior.

Indexed as

computational neurosciencelarval zebrafishmousemulti-region communicationneural dynamicsneural population interactionsprimaterecurrent neural networks

Identifiers

PMID42567158
PMCPMC13565020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.