ReviewThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026
Psychological adversities and epigenetic ageing in midlife and older age: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpigenetic modification is a hallmark of aging that encloses physiological information relevant to health and longevity and has been used to construct epigenetic clocks that estimate epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) to monitor population health across the life span. Psychological adversities (PA) are recognized contributors to poor health; however, their potential role in EAA remains insufficiently understood in older adults.
objectiveThis study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the association between PA and EAA from midlife onward.
methodsEligible literatures were indexed in five databases up to July 2025. Study quality was assessed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, followed by post hoc and sensitivity analyses to assess robustness.
resultsTwenty-two studies were included, of which fifteen were classified as high quality. Irrespective of the type of psychological adversity, positive associations were consistently observed for second-generation epigenetic clocks (PhenoAge and GrimAge). Meta-analyses revealed that greater loneliness (β = 0.07, 95 % CI [0.06, 0.08], I
conclusionsPsychosocial stress, depression, and loneliness are each associated with accelerated aging from midlife onward. Notable gaps include the lack of studies examining anxiety and underrepresentation of non-Western population. Whether alleviating psychological adversities translates into decelerated aging trajectories requests future intervention studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.