SynthesisJMIR perioperative medicine2026
Patient Satisfaction With Perioperative Services and Associated Factors in Ethiopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of health care quality, and it guides improvement efforts. Although many local studies have examined perioperative patient satisfaction in Ethiopia, there is no comprehensive national synthesis. This gap limits the development of targeted strategies to enhance patient care. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the pooled prevalence of patient satisfaction with perioperative services in Ethiopia and identify associated factors. Methods: This study included all observational research articles on patient satisfaction with perioperative services in Ethiopia. A multidatabase search strategy, incorporating PubMed/MEDLINE, HINARI, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, African Journals Online, and Scopus, was used alongside a gray literature search to identify all Ethiopian studies on perioperative satisfaction available before January 1, 2024. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. To assess heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were conducted, and I² statistics were calculated. This study used funnel plots, the Egger test, and a nonparametric trim-and-fill analysis to assess publication bias. A sensitivity analysis was also used to identify any influential studies. Univariate meta-regression examined the association between study-level covariates and perioperative satisfaction. Results: This review included 21 studies comprising 6858 participants. Overall satisfaction with perioperative services was expressed by 5072 participants (73.96%, 95% CI 68.84%-79.08%; I²=96.56%). Factors significantly associated with higher satisfaction included effective postoperative pain management (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.23, 95% CI 1.56-2.90), illiteracy (AOR 3.18, 95% CI 1.23-5.13), primary school education (AOR 6.55, 95% CI 3.61-9.49), local anesthesia use (AOR 2.80, 95% CI 2.03-3.57), and history of prior surgery or anesthesia (AOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.51-4.01). Conclusions: This study found that the pooled prevalence of patient satisfaction with perioperative services in Ethiopia was 73.96% (5072/6858 participants). Postoperative pain management, illiteracy, primary school, local anesthesia, and a history of surgery or anesthesia were significantly associated with patient satisfaction with perioperative services. Health care facilities should focus on providing effective postoperative pain management, clear information about perioperative services, and training for surgical and anesthesia teams to boost patient satisfaction with perioperative services in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.