Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42566746›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Privacy-Preserving Framework for Multi-Institutional Medical Time-Series Analysis via Homomorphic Encryption: Design and Development Study.

Yao Lu, Yu Tian, Tianshu Zhou, Jing Xia, Zhensong Zhao, Huiyao Sun, Kangli Liu, Jingsong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yao Lu *Research Center for Scientific Data Hub, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0261-0713
Yu Tian *Engineering Research Center of EMR and Intelligent Expert System, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of the Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310027, China, 86 13958134365.ORCID 0000-0002-6791-8217
Tianshu ZhouResearch Center for Scientific Data Hub, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5858-6353
Jing XiaResearch Center for Scientific Data Hub, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5476-727X
Zhensong ZhaoEngineering Research Center of EMR and Intelligent Expert System, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of the Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310027, China, 86 13958134365.ORCID 0009-0002-1838-2919
Huiyao SunResearch Center for Scientific Data Hub, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0009-0004-7183-7649
Kangli LiuResearch Center for Scientific Data Hub, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0009-0001-9248-0157
Jingsong LiEngineering Research Center of EMR and Intelligent Expert System, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of the Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310027, China, 86 13958134365.ORCID 0000-0002-1064-637X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The development of robust medical AI for knowledge discovery and decision support commonly necessitates large-scale datasets from multiple institutions. However, such data aggregation is severely constrained by privacy regulations and the inherent risk of sensitive information leakage, making it difficult to navigate the utility-privacy trade-off. Objective: We aimed to design a secure multiparty deep learning system that enables privacy-preserving modeling from distributed medical time-series data without centralizing raw information or exposing model parameters. Our goal was to achieve predictive accuracy comparable to nonsecure models while providing strong security and efficiency. Methods: We developed a framework using threshold homomorphic encryption to securely train recurrent neural networks on distributed longitudinal data. To improve the efficiency, we proposed an optimized encrypted matrix multiplication scheme, a secure ciphertext refresh protocol, and used lightweight encryption parameters and low-degree approximated activation polynomials. The system was evaluated on 4 real-world intensive care unit datasets for tasks like mortality and sepsis prediction. Results: The system demonstrated practical efficiency, requiring approximately 1 minute per training iteration for processing 125 local batches over 39 variables and 48 time steps, and scaling well with data size and participant number. Securely trained models achieved predictive performance that was comparable to, and in some cases superior to, nonsecure centralized models, highlighting their ability to learn generalizable patterns in different unseen data distributions. For example, on the PhysioNet Challenge 2012 dataset, our secure model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8480, outperforming the nonsecure baseline AUC of 0.8404. Conclusions: This work provides a viable and efficient solution for cross-institutional, privacy-preserving analysis of longitudinal medical data. The framework successfully bridges the utility-privacy gap, facilitating safer collaborative research and enabling robust knowledge discovery and decision support while adhering to strict data protection standards.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityConfidentialityPrivacyHumansRecurrent Neural Networkshomomorphic encryptionmedical time-series analysispatient data privacyprivacy-preserving learningrecurrent neural networkssecure multiparty computation

Identifiers

PMID42566746
PMCPMC13450883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.