Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42566676›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in infectious diseases2026

Recent developments in typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella vaccines.

Michael Blank, Anna Rydlova, Malick M Gibani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael BlankDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anna Rydlova
Malick M Gibani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTyphoidal and invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella (iNTS) serovars remain leading causes of bloodstream infection, mortality and morbidity, particularly in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. The rising burden of antimicrobial resistance has strengthened the case for vaccination as a control strategy. This review summarises recent advances in Salmonella vaccine development, highlighting progress, remaining challenges and future directions. RECENT

findingsThe introduction of typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV) programmes across some endemic countries represents a major public health milestone. Important questions remain, however. These include the durability of protection, optimal booster strategies and performance in diverse epidemiological settings. Vaccine development for S. Paratyphi A and iNTS has also accelerated, with candidates including conjugate, outer membrane vesicle/GMMA and live-attenuated, platforms advancing through preclinical and early clinical evaluation. Multivalent vaccine strategies have attracted growing interest. However, the divergent epidemiology of typhoidal and non-typhoidal disease, including differences in age-specific risk and geographic distribution, raises important questions about whether a single combination product is suitable for all settings. SUMMARY: The Salmonella vaccine landscape is evolving rapidly from a focus on typhoid alone toward broader protection against multiple clinically important serovars. Although recent progress is encouraging, important scientific, regulatory, and implementation challenges remain. The practical case for integrated Salmonella vaccine strategies will depend on careful matching of vaccine composition to the differing epidemiology, age-specific risks, and delivery contexts of typhoidal and nontyphoidal disease.

Indexed as

SalmonellaSalmonella InfectionsSalmonella VaccinesTyphoid FeverTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesVaccine DevelopmentAfrica South of the SaharaHumansVaccines, ConjugateSalmonella VaccinesTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesVaccines, Conjugateenteric feverimmunological correlatesvaccine developmentvaccines

Identifiers

PMID42566676
PMCPMC13566389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.