ArticleMedicine2026
CT-based radiomics and nnU-Net deep features for predicting calcaneal spurs: Development and validation of a combined clinical imaging model (A retrospective study).
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based model that combines radiomics features, deep features derived from nnU-Net, and clinical imaging variables for predicting the presence of calcaneal spurs. In this retrospective study, 803 calcaneal CT images were included and randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 642) and a test cohort (n = 161). The calcaneus was segmented with an iterative semiautomatic no new U-Net (nnU-Net) workflow, and conventional radiomics features and nnU-Net deep features were extracted from the reviewed regions of interest. Stable and discriminative features were selected using the intraclass correlation coefficient, between-group testing, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Support vector machine models with ten-fold cross-validation and grid search were used to generate the radiomics score (Rad-score) and nnU-Net score. Logistic regression was used to develop the clinical and combined models. Model performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), calibration analysis, decision curve analysis, and interpretability analysis. Age and Gissane's angle were retained in the clinical model. The combined model included the Rad-score, nnU-Net score, and Gissane's angle. In the training cohort, the combined model achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.916 (95% confidence interval: 0.894-0.937), exceeding the nnU-Net, radiomics, and clinical models. In the test cohort, the combined model also showed the highest area under the ROC curve (0.772; 95% confidence interval: 0.700-0.843), compared with the nnU-Net model (0.705), radiomics model (0.710), and clinical model (0.691). Calibration analysis showed acceptable agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, with Hosmer-Lemeshow P values of .218 and .463 in the training and test cohorts, respectively. Decision curve analysis suggested a higher net benefit for the combined model across clinically relevant threshold ranges. A CT-based combined model integrating the Rad-score, nnU-Net score, and Gissane's angle improved the prediction of calcaneal spur presence compared with clinical or imaging models alone. This model may provide a quantitative imaging tool for risk stratification of calcaneal spurs in patients undergoing foot or ankle CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.