ArticleMedicine2026
The creatinine-to-albumin ratio as a prognostic indicator in critically ill patients with cirrhosis: A cohort study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic significance of the creatinine-to-albumin ratio (CAR) in various diseases is well-established; however, its utility in forecasting survival in patients with cirrhosis remains to be determined. This study aims to examine the association between CAR and mortality in cirrhotic patients. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the association between CAR and mortality in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality after intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and the secondary outcomes were 90-, 180-, and 365-day all-cause mortality after ICU admission. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, restricted cubic spline modeling, and subgroup analyses were performed to assess the prognostic value of CAR. The fully adjusted Cox model included demographic factors, selected vital signs and laboratory variables, cirrhosis-related complications, sepsis, and mechanical ventilation. External validation was performed in the eICU Collaborative Research Database cohort using the same CAR cutoff and analytical methods. This study included 1083 patients, with in-hospital and ICU mortality rates of 22.1% and 13.7%. Using X-tile software, the optimal CAR cutoff was 0.53, defining high-risk (CAR ≥ 0.53) and low-risk (CAR < 0.53) groups. Higher CAR was associated with increased mortality at 28, 90, 180, and 365 days (all P < .05). Cox regression confirmed CAR as an independent predictor across all time points, and Kaplan-Meier curves showed consistently poorer survival in the high-risk group (all P < .05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated moderate discrimination for short- and long-term mortality, with area under the curve values exceeding creatinine and albumin. Restricted cubic spline modeling demonstrated an overall positive association between CAR and mortality risk, with evidence of nonlinearity for longer-term outcomes. Subgroup analyses showed consistent findings across strata, with no significant interactions. External validation in the eICU Collaborative Research Database cohort showed consistent associations between elevated CAR and increased 28-day mortality. CAR was independently associated with mortality and may serve as a simple adjunctive prognostic marker in critically ill patients with cirrhosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.