Observational studyMedicine2026
Predicting early postoperative corneal edema after phacoemulsification: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and internally validate a multivariable prediction model for early postoperative corneal edema following phacoemulsification by integrating patient-related and intraoperative parameters. This retrospective cohort study included 912 consecutive eyes from 912 patients who underwent standard phacoemulsification at a tertiary ophthalmic center in Southwest China between January 2021 and January 2023. Early postoperative corneal edema was defined as either a ≥5% increase in central corneal thickness from baseline on postoperative day 1 or the presence of clinically significant stromal haze on slit-lamp examination. Demographic, systemic, preoperative, and intraoperative variables were evaluated using univariate logistic regression, followed by multivariable logistic regression for model development. Model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, whereas calibration was evaluated using calibration plots, calibration intercept and slope, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. A nomogram was constructed based on the final multivariable model to estimate individualized risk. Early postoperative corneal edema occurred in 138 of 912 eyes (15.1%). In the multivariable model, older age, diabetes mellitus, lower preoperative endothelial cell density, and greater cataract and intraoperative complexity, reflected by higher lens nucleus hardness, longer operative duration, higher cumulative dissipated energy, and greater irrigation volume, were associated with early postoperative corneal edema. Intraoperative anterior chamber instability and capsular rupture or vitreous loss were also associated with an increased risk. The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.892 (95% confidence interval: 0.865-0.919) and demonstrated acceptable calibration in internal validation. Both systemic and intraoperative factors were associated with early postoperative corneal edema after phacoemulsification. The internally validated prediction model demonstrated good discrimination and calibration and may support preliminary perioperative risk estimation in similar clinical settings. However, external validation is required before the nomogram can be recommended for routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.