ArticleMedicine2026
Genetic evidence for behavioral preference factors on fatigue: A Mendelian randomization study of chronotype, morning alertness, and outdoor exposure.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fatigue is a multifactorial condition influenced by environmental, behavioral, genetic, and disease-related factors. While observational studies have identified key contributors like circadian disruption, sleep disturbances, and genetic predisposition, the causal relationships remain unclear. Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a robust approach to overcome limitations of traditional studies and establish causal links between modifiable behavioral preferences and fatigue. This study employed univariate and multivariate MR (MVMR) analyses using publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics to investigate the potential causal relationships between these behavioral preference factors and the risk of fatigue. We obtained GWAS summary statistics for relevant variables from the Neale Lab and MRC Integrated Epidemiology Unit (MRC-IEU) databases. After systematic screening of multiple domains (internal microenvironment, indoor environment parameters, and natural environment characteristics), the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method served as the primary analysis, complemented by sensitivity analysis (heterogeneity test, pleiotropy analysis, leave-one-out analysis, and MR-PRESSO) to evaluate result robustness. Using GWAS data from 32 traits (1645,048 participants), we identified three significant behavioral preference-related determinants of fatigue: chronotype, ease of getting up in the morning, and time spent outdoors in summer. The MR results demonstrated: Protective effects against fatigue associated with greater ease of getting up in the morning (OR = 0.991, 95%CI 0.987-0.995; P < .001) and longer summer outdoor exposure (OR = 0.996, 95%CI 0.992-1.000; P = .030); Elevated fatigue risk,linked to evening chronotype (OR = 1.003, 95%CI 1.001-1.005; P = .013). MVMR analysis showed that after jointly incorporating variables, the impact of ease of getting up in the morning on fatigue remained significant (OR = 0.987, 95%CI: 0.980-0.995, P = .002). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings: although significant heterogeneity was detected for ease of getting up in the morning (Cochran's Q test P < .05), no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy (MR-Egger intercept P > .05) or outlier SNPs (MR-PRESSO) was found, and results were consistent across multiple MR methods. These findings provide genetic evidence supporting causal relationships between modifiable behavioral preference factors and fatigue. Specifically, greater ease of getting up in the morning and longer summer outdoor exposure may reduce fatigue risk, while evening chronotype increases susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.