ArticleMedicine2026
Trends, impact, and future directions of ankle injury research in soccer players: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study presents a bibliometric analysis of research trends in ankle injuries among soccer players, aiming to inform prevention and treatment strategies.
methodsA comprehensive search of the Web of Science Core Collection database was conducted on July 2, 2024, for English-language original articles on ankle injuries in soccer/football players (published 1983 to July 2, 2024) using a predefined topic query. Publication trends, collaboration networks (countries/institutions/authors), journal analyses, keyword co-occurrence, and citation bursts were evaluated with VOSviewer 1.6.20, CiteSpace 6.3.R1, and R 4.3.3.
resultsPublication output increased substantially over the study period, with the United States leading in research output. The American Journal of Sports Medicine was a key publication venue. Author-level analyses showed contributions from multiple highly cited researchers and collaborative teams, indicating that the field has been shaped by diverse international efforts rather than by any single researcher. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was the leading institution. Recent keyword analyses emphasized risk factors, injury management, and balance, reflecting increased research attention to prevention and rehabilitation.
conclusionOverall, the findings demonstrate a clear evolution in the field, highlighting the shift toward proactive strategies for reducing the risk and impact of ankle injuries and improving athlete care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.