ArticleScience advances2026
Start, speed, and direction of secondary forest succession.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Succession is a foundational concept in ecology, describing changes in populations, communities, and ecosystems over time following a disturbance. Predicting successional pathways is challenging because of high spatiotemporal variability. Here, we present a unifying mechanistic framework that integrates three core components of succession (start, speed, and direction) that define successional pathways. We monitored the first 5 years of forest succession in recently abandoned agricultural fields in six tropical landscapes across three countries that differ in land-use intensity and between dry and wet forests. We found that (i) secondary succession typically started with woody legacies and progressed slowly but directionally toward structurally complex, biodiverse forests, and (ii) the start and speed were greater in areas with short-duration, low-intensity (nonmechanized) land use associated with more biological legacies. This framework advances mechanistic understanding of succession by disentangling the start, speed, and direction, and provides a tool for designing effective forest restoration strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.